You can assess LLM-generated code summary quality by measuring inter-model agreement and using an LLM-as-judge, eliminating the need for expensive human reference summaries.
This paper proposes a method to evaluate whether AI-generated code summaries are correct without needing human reference summaries. It uses multiple AI models to generate summaries, has another AI model compare them pairwise, and combines these judgments with a calibrated rule that rewards agreement and penalizes only confirmed disagreements.